I understand that some people would like to explore in the Arctic Refuge, but I think that in many ways, your comments make me feel even more strongly about why it should not be taking place. Obviously, when the gentleman went there, it was a very beautiful area; the gentleman was witnessing the wildlife. The gentleman seems to feel that whatever has happened so far has not had an impact, but it is obvious from what the gentleman witnessed that it is a very sensitive area, and there is a lot of wildlife. And it is a very beautiful, pristine area. I would maintain that given that fact and given the fact that we are not really talking about that much oil over the long time that is going to impact, I think, U.S. energy policy that we should not take the risk; that the very fact that it is difficult to get there and it is difficult for people to deal with the situation there means that if there was a spill or if there were environmental problems, it would be that much more difficult to clean it up.
Frank Pallone: “I understand that some people would like to explore in the Arctic Refuge, but I think that in many ways, your comments…”
On the recordOctober 5, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the environmental concerns regarding oil exploration in the Arctic Refuge.
Share
More from Frank Pallone
Aug 22, 2026
For years, I’ve fought for federal funding to make the Carteret ferry a reality because projects like this make a real difference in people’s lives. This $9.6 million investment helps to put another vessel on the water and takes cars off…
Aug 8, 2026
The reports coming from Keyport continue to be concerning enough for my constituents to repeatedly and urgently share their concerns with me.
Jul 31, 2026
My visits to Delaney Hall have uncovered serious concerns about how people are being treated and whether basic human standards are being met. Republicans should not be giving President Trump’s ICE your tax dollars.





