Chairman Dingell, I want to thank you for all the hard work you have put in on this bill, and also Chairman Waxman. We worked on a bipartisan basis. I rise today in strong support of the Food Safety Modernization Act. After 2 years of hard work, we're finally on the cusp of enacting landmark comprehensive food safety legislation. The modernization of our food safety system is desperately needed. The current food regulatory regime was established in 1938 and hasn't been overhauled in 70 years. Since this time, the U.S. food supply has evolved into a global network made up of foreign products, processors, and growers over whom the U.S. has little or no control. Think about what a different world it was in 1938. That alone should be reason enough to update our food safety laws today. Every time we have a food safety crisis, be it eggs or spinach or peppers or peanuts, we shake our heads at the vulnerability of our food supply and bemoan the fact that we don't have the tools to protect it. And these aren't isolated instances. Each year, 48 million Americans are sickened from consuming contaminated food, and as many as 3,000 to 5,000 of these people die. The Food Safety Modernization Act will give the FDA the ability, the authority, and the resources to protect American consumers from contaminated food domestically and abroad.…
Share & report
More from Frank Pallone
Again, I urge that we support this legislation on a bipartisan basis. Sickle cell disease is something that we need to continue to research and help with. This is an important bill in that respect. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of…
I simply urge support for this legislation on a bipartisan basis, and I yield back the balance of my time.
This is such an important bill that does research on not only Down syndrome but other conditions, and I urge my colleagues to support it on a bipartisan basis. I yield back the balance of my time.
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 219, nays 186, not voting 26, as follows: [Roll No. 437]…





