I respect Dr. Burgess a great deal, but I have no idea why he would be opposed to having an agency that is essentially putting a check on the insurance companies. The problem is that the insurance companies keep raising rates, they don't show the consumer what the real benefits that they're receiving are, and what we need is more transparency and some way to review these insurance premium rates so that they don't get out of hand. The fact of the matter is that this agency, working with States, has already had great success. In Connecticut, regulators recently rejected a proposed 20 percent rate increase by Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield. In Maine, the State superintendent rejected WellPoint's Empire Blue Cross request to raise rates by 23 percent. Colorado, also, and in California, the review prompted Anthem Blue Cross to withdraw its request for a 39 percent premium increase. Why are you objecting to us trying to put a check on these insurance companies that keep raising their rates at outrageous levels? That's what this is all about. I oppose this amendment.
On the recordFebruary 18, 2011
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
The speaker is addressing the need for an agency to regulate insurance companies and prevent excessive rate increases.
Share
More from Frank Pallone
May 29, 2026
People are languishing without knowing if they’ll have enough to eat or if they’ll be able to receive medical care if they get sick.
Jun 6, 2026
"Bill Pascrell understood before most people that traumatic brain injuries were a serious and often invisible public health crisis," said Congressman Pallone.
Jun 1, 2026
My office has received concerned calls from New Jerseyans who have reported that detainees at Delaney Hall have been beaten and pepper sprayed in retaliation for protesting the horrific conditions of this for-profit facility.
Jun 12, 2026
I will continue to call for accountability and carry out oversight of this facility.





