Well, I just wanted to say that my colleague from Texas has brought up a number of really important points here. Number one, the whole issue of costs, we have been criticized, Democrats have been criticized, for their patient protection bill by the allegations by the insurance industry that it is going to cost a lot more money. The gentleman points out that in Texas, there has actually been no premium increase. We had a report from the Congressional Budget Office that just came out a couple of weeks ago on our Democrat bill that said that even if everything passed and our bill was law, at the most, individuals would pay only about two dollars more per month for the patient protections that are so important to the American people. The other thing the gentleman pointed out is that we have, in effect, now, these two regimes, if you will, for people who are in ERISA and they are working for an employer that has a self-insured plan, which now preempts, the Federal law preempts it, and those people are not coming under ERISA. One of the things that is important is some of the proposals put forward by the Republicans, particularly the Senate proposal, actually does not even provide the patient protections if you are not under ERISA.
Frank Pallone: “Well, I just wanted to say that my colleague from Texas has brought up a number of really important points here. Number…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the costs and implications of the patient protection bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Frank Pallone
People in Central Jersey should not have to spend hours of their lives sitting in traffic just to get to and from work. We need to give commuters more reliable ways to get where they need to go, and that means actually investing in public…
As the top Congressional leaders with oversight of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), it is within your jurisdiction to ensure our nation’s disaster relief efforts are “fast, fair, and free from political bias,” as Chairman…
This $9.6 million investment helps to put another vessel on the water and takes cars off our overcrowded roads. That is exactly what federal infrastructure dollars should be doing.
If Delaney Hall cannot be operated in compliance with federal law and the Constitution, GEO Group should not continue to profit from taxpayer dollars and Delaney Hall should be closed.





