The gentleman keeps saying that this administration is banning gas stoves. That is simply not the case. Plus, he is talking about efficiency standards. This legislation is not about efficiency standards. This legislation is about saying that the Consumer Product Safety Commission cannot research and make decisions about hazards and whether a particular gas stove is hazardous to people's health or might explode. It is not about efficiency standards. Certainly we are not talking about saying that you have to move toward an electric stove as opposed to a gas stove. It just bothers me, Mr. Chair, that the other side continues to talk about banning gas stoves, about moving toward electric stoves, about efficiency standards. This is not what this bill is about. This is not what the Consumer Product Safety Commission is about. Mr. Chair, again, I would urge opposition because the gentleman is not talking about this legislation. Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Frank Pallone
May I ask again as to the time remaining on each side? The SPEAKER pro tempore (Ms. Tenney). The gentleman from New Jersey has 5\1/2\ minutes remaining. The gentlewoman from Washington has 6\1/4\ minutes remaining.
Again, I am a little confused. If the gentleman--if Mr. Griffith's comment was about the fact that we cannot bring up Elon Musk, who is essentially in charge of so many government programs, including everything at the EPA--again, I was in…
I have no additional speakers, and I am prepared to close. Mr. Speaker, again, this is a bill that addresses wasteful spending, and I think it is important for us to make sure we support it on a bipartisan basis. Mr. Speaker, I yield back…
I urge all of us to support this bill on a bipartisan basis. Whatever we can do to fight Alzheimer's is very important. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.





