Political Quotes

On the recordMarch 29, 2023
Frankly, I have no idea why this amendment is being offered. It would force the Department of Energy to ride the roller coaster that is the oil future's market, without any option to just pay a simple fixed price for a barrel of oil. If oil goes up $20 per barrel between when DOE purchases oil for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and when it is delivered, well, that is too bad. We are now paying $20 per barrel more, and we will have to buy less oil. This amendment unnecessarily restrains DOE and makes purchasing petroleum products to refill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve more expensive. DOE recognized as much when it issued a rulemaking last fall clarifying that it could purchase oil at a fixed price, as common sense would dictate. There is no reason that it should be illegal for the Department of Energy to sign a contract saying that it will purchase oil for $70 per barrel. No reason that I can think of. Except, of course, if you are an oil company that wants the Department of Energy to pay more to refill the reserve. {time} 1615 However, if you are an average American, then this amendment is a raw deal. It constrains the Department of Energy's usage of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which is partially responsible for the tremendous over $1.50 per gallon fall in the cost of gasoline we have seen since last summer's peak gas prices. I will note that when the Department of Energy issued its notice of proposed rulemaking this last summer, industry did not object.…
Said by
Frank Pallone
Democratic · New Jersey

Share & report

More from Frank Pallone

Sep 17, 2024

I think we heard from Representative Trahan why this is so important. I urge all colleagues to vote for it on a bipartisan basis, and I yield back the balance of my time.

govinfo.gov
Sep 17, 2024

I have no additional speakers, and I am prepared to close. Mr. Speaker, again, this is a bill that addresses wasteful spending, and I think it is important for us to make sure we support it on a bipartisan basis. Mr. Speaker, I yield back…

govinfo.gov
Feb 26, 2025

Again, $7.2 billion to have dirtier air, a more unstable climate, and waste more gas. I mean, it is really unbelievable. Republicans have spent years getting mad about the deficit, but as we saw yesterday, the first chance they got, they…

govinfo.gov
Feb 26, 2025

As I mentioned, I am very much opposed to this resolution, and a big part of it is because I think it will cost the American taxpayers and the Federal Government more money. The CBO has a preliminary cost estimate for this resolution, and…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation