Seniors understand, when we talk to them and when we have town meetings, that there is essentially no surplus; that the so-called surplus that we talk about is essentially what is owed to Social Security, and that we have to pay back a lot of money to the Social Security trust fund over the next 5 or 10 years if we are to have enough benefits to pay out to Social Security recipients. That is why this Republican tax proposal is really the wrong way to go. What will happen, essentially, is that we will, in fact, increase the debt and, ultimately, may have to raise taxes in order to provide the benefits that Social Security recipients need. So what I say is we spent a lot of time last year on a bipartisan basis to pass a Balanced Budget Act. We have a balanced budget, but we still have this problem that we have to pay back Social Security. We do not have a surplus. We do not have one to spend. Let us not, in the few weeks we have here in this Congress, waste our time trying to kid the American people that somehow we are going to give them tax relief. It is not really there to spend.
Frank Pallone: “Seniors understand, when we talk to them and when we have town meetings, that there is essentially no surplus; that the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Republican tax proposal on Social Security during a floor speech.
Share
More from Frank Pallone
As members of the military sacrifice daily to protect our country, we have a responsibility to equip them with basic protection that safeguards their health during their service to our nation.
The reports coming from Keyport continue to be concerning enough for my constituents to repeatedly and urgently share their concerns with me.
Communities across the nation are frustrated and angry about the pace of giant data centers being constructed in their back yards.
Parents deserve accurate, trusted medical guidance, not a White House-curated list designed to rubberstamp Secretary Kennedy’s radical anti-vaccine agenda





