Today marks the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade. Ultimately decisions about whether to choose adoption, end a pregnancy, or raise a child must be left to a woman, her family, and her faith, with the counsel of her doctor or health care provider. Roe v. Wade prevents politicians from interfering with a woman's personal decision. Were Roe ever to be overturned, it could have ripple effects. Our laws and traditions afford constitutional protections to personal decisions relating to, among other things, marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child-rearing, and intimacy. The right to privacy, strengthened by Roe, supports each of these areas. Overturning Roe could thus potentially erode the ability of individuals to make highly personal decisions free from intrusive government regulations and harm the overall right to privacy. ____________________
Share & report
More from Frank Pallone
I have no additional speakers, and I yield myself the balance of my time to close. Let me just say that this is an important step forward in dealing with online dating safety, and I support the bill and urge my colleagues to support it. I…
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. Announcement by the Speaker Pro Tempore The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 9 of Rule XX, this 15- minute vote on passage will be followed by a 5-minute vote on…
As I mentioned, I am very much opposed to this resolution, and a big part of it is because I think it will cost the American taxpayers and the Federal Government more money. The CBO has a preliminary cost estimate for this resolution, and…
Again, $7.2 billion to have dirtier air, a more unstable climate, and waste more gas. I mean, it is really unbelievable. Republicans have spent years getting mad about the deficit, but as we saw yesterday, the first chance they got, they…





