I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 1, line 18, strike ``a cross-border segment of''. Page 2, beginning on line 3, strike ``a certificate of crossing for'' and insert ``approval of''. Page 2, line 5, strike ``the cross-border segment'' and insert ``the pipeline or facility''. Page 2, line 6, strike ``Certificate of Crossing'' and insert ``Approval''. Page 2, line 10, strike ``cross-border segment'' and insert ``project''. Page 2, beginning on line 14, strike ``issue a certificate of crossing for the cross-border segment'' and insert ``approve such project''. Page 2, line 17, strike ``of the cross-border segment''. Page 3, line 3, strike ``a certificate of crossing for'' and insert ``approval of''. Page 3, beginning on line 4, strike ``a cross-border segment of''. Page 3, line 7, strike ``issuing the certificate of crossing for'' and insert ``approving''. Page 3, beginning on line 8, strike ``the cross-border segment of''. Page 3, beginning on line 16, strike ``the cross-border segment of''. Page 3, beginning on line 20, strike ``a cross-border segment of''. Page 4, line 1, strike ``cross-border segment'' and insert ``pipeline or facility''. Page 4, line 7, strike ``a certificate of crossing for'' and insert ``approval of''. Page 4, line 21, strike ``a certificate of crossing for'' and insert ``approval of''.…
On the recordJune 24, 2014
Source
govinfo.govShare & report
More from Frank Pallone
May 14, 2024
I ask that we support this important legislation on both sides of the aisle, and I yield back the balance of my time.
May 7, 2024
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 212, nays 195, not voting 23, as follows: [Roll No. 184]…
May 7, 2024
I claim the time in opposition to the amendment. The CHAIR. The gentleman from New Jersey is recognized for 5 minutes.
May 7, 2024
First, as I have already said, the Department of Energy must already ensure that energy conservation standards are economically justified, so this amendment is totally unnecessary. Instead of being helpful, this amendment adds duplicative…





