Well, the gentlewoman has brought up and highlighted, I think, the biggest gimmick of all with regard to this Republican bill. Essentially my understanding is that at least on the Senate side, if not on the House side, that the Republican bill only applies to ERISA plans, and of course ERISA plans are those that are preempted by the Federal Government because they are self-insured essentially, and these are the very ones that we discussed earlier where there is no enforcement because the patient cannot sue the HMO if they have denied care. So what you have here is hollow patient protections. Not only does the Republican bill limit the patient protections and not include some of the most important ones that the Democrats have talked about, like access to specialty care, for example, but, in addition, by limiting the patient protections to ERISA plans they guaranteed that the patient protections would never be enforced, because if you are in ERISA, you will have the patient protections, albeit limited, but you will not be able to sue so there will be no guarantee of the patient protections.
Frank Pallone: “Well, the gentlewoman has brought up and highlighted, I think, the biggest gimmick of all with regard to this Republican…”
On the recordJuly 16, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the limitations of a Republican healthcare bill regarding patient protections.
Share
More from Frank Pallone
Aug 26, 2026
If they cannot be operated in compliance with federal law and the Constitution, GEO Group, CoreCivic, and any other private contractors should not continue to profit from taxpayer dollars, and the detention centers must be closed.
Jun 25, 2026
Towns in my district are way ahead of this Congress in seeking a moratorium. Asbury Park, Red Bank, Old Bridge and Sayreville all have taken this bold step.
Aug 14, 2026
Denying disaster assistance to American citizens just because they live in states that elected Democratic governors is a betrayal of the oath President Trump swore to uphold.





