What is really deceptive about this tax bill and why it is really bad is that in the outyears, that means beyond the year 2007, this explodes. What they did was they made very few changes and sort of said, ``But we'll phase it in 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 years from now.'' Most of the people who voted for this do not expect to be here when the deficit is re-created, as it was after the 1981 tax bill. The fact is that if we look at the charts that the gentleman has there, it is very clear that the bottom 40 percent gets nothing. I offered an amendment in the committee on an issue that is a very familiar one and, that is, the marriage tax penalty. Let us say you are a couple. You make $30,000 between you. You make $15,000 apiece. If you file together, you pay 10 percent more tax. This was in the Contract With America. Two hundred some odd Members of this House signed the Contract on America and said we want to get rid of the marriage tax penalty because we want to encourage people to get married.
Frank Pallone: “What is really deceptive about this tax bill and why it is really bad is that in the outyears, that means beyond the…”
On the recordJune 17, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a tax bill and its effects on marriage tax penalties.
Share
More from Frank Pallone
Aug 5, 2026
My colleagues and I warned Trump and DHS this would happen, and now a 39-year-old father has died because they refused to listen. There must be an immediate investigation.
Jun 30, 2026
The bipartisan KIDS Act does just that. It is comprehensive legislation that addresses a problem everyone in Congress cares deeply about – keeping kids and teens safe online.
Aug 11, 2026
Parents deserve accurate, trusted medical guidance, not a White House-curated list designed to rubberstamp Secretary Kennedy’s radical anti-vaccine agenda
Jun 30, 2026
I urge my colleagues to vote yes on the KIDS Act to make the internet a safer place for our kids and teens.





