Mr. President, my amendment, the domestic violence amendment, establishes a policy of zero tolerance when it comes to guns and domestic violence. The amendment would prohibit any person convicted of domestic violence from possessing a firearm. In simple words, the amendment says that wife beaters and child abusers should not have guns. Mr. President, I want to explain for a moment why this amendment is needed. Under current Federal law it is illegal for persons convicted of felonies to possess firearms. Yet many people who engage in serious spousal or child abuse ultimately are not charged with or convicted with felonies. At the end of the day, due to outdated thinking, or perhaps after a plea bargain, they are--at most--convicted of a misdemeanor. In fact, Mr. President, most of those who commit family violence are never even prosecuted. When they are, one-third of the cases that would be considered felonies if committed by strangers are, instead, filed as misdemeanors. The fact is, in many places today, domestic violence is not taken as seriously as other forms of criminal behavior.
Frank Lautenberg: “Mr. President, my amendment, the domestic violence amendment, establishes a policy of zero tolerance when it comes to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a domestic violence amendment to prohibit firearm possession by those convicted of domestic violence.
Share
More from Frank Lautenberg
Thank you for scheduling this hearing to consider the re-nomination of Dr. Allison Macfarlane to be Chairwoman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
Immigration is not a zero sum game. If we attract the best talent in the world to come to America, they will create jobs, not displace them.
Consumers care about intrusions into their private lives, not just from hackers or governmental entities, but also from commercial entities.
Efforts to consolidate these grants could shift critical grant funds away from the areas most at-risk for a terror attack, like my State of New Jersey.





