I thank the Senator from California and commend her for the struggle we have had with this issue when, in fact, there should not be any struggle. This is not an issue, in my view, that ought to be debated. To reduce the protection we want to offer our families to me sounds silly, and I believe to the American public it is going to sound silly as well. I do not ascribe any evil intent on the part of the Senator from Alaska, but I think it is absolutely mistaken. The question before us today is simply, Whose side are you on? Do you want to afford your children and your grandchildren the most protection they can have against foul air, against contamination, against pollution generally, or are you worried about the oil companies? We should not have to worry about them. As a matter of fact, they ought to worry a little more about us--a heck of a lot more about us. Taking nothing away from the experience and the knowledge the Senator from Alaska brings, I was in Alaska the second day after the Exxon Valdez ran aground. I saw the casual attitude that prevailed with Exxon.
Frank Lautenberg: “I thank the Senator from California and commend her for the struggle we have had with this issue when, in fact, there…”
Editor's note · Context
Lautenberg addresses environmental protection and corporate responsibility in the context of pollution and public health.
Share
More from Frank Lautenberg
Thank you for scheduling this hearing to consider the re-nomination of Dr. Allison Macfarlane to be Chairwoman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
I thank the chairman for making this clarification. I agree completely with my colleagues concerning the need for section 3004. Could the language in section 3004 about inclusion of specific project recommendations and feasibility studies…
I have long been concerned with the understaffing of air traffic controllers at Newark Liberty and I am concerned the sequestration-imposed air traffic controller furloughs will disproportionately impact this airport.





