my amendment establishes a reserve fund for national defense and homeland security. The amendment is necessary because the budget resolution actually cuts defense spending by $103 billion below the President's request over that 10-year window. That is according to CBO and SBC. From 2004 through 2008, the Republican budget assumes defense spending at the level requested by the President. But the last 5 years of the budget window, from 2009 through 2013, the Republican budget resolution cuts $103 billion below the level CBO estimates. I ask that my friends on the Republican side of the aisle be very careful when they look at the Republican message. It says the Lautenberg amendment reduces the growth package by $103 billion in budget authority and $88 billion in outlays. They don't say that the budget comes from the tax cuts.
Frank Lautenberg: “my amendment establishes a reserve fund for national defense and homeland security. The amendment is necessary because…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to national defense and homeland security funding.
Share
More from Frank Lautenberg
Republicans in the Congress continue to call for even deeper budget cuts--despite clear evidence that the austerity agenda they have championed has slowed the pace of job growth and needlessly increased the suffering of children, seniors…
I am honored to serve as chairman of this subcommittee, which has jurisdiction over crucial Federal programs that support our economy.
I am concerned that with our budget difficulties we will continue to see declining budgets for Defense Nuclear Non-Proliferation activities in favor of Weapons Activities.
I thank the chairman for making this clarification. I agree completely with my colleagues concerning the need for section 3004. Could the language in section 3004 about inclusion of specific project recommendations and feasibility studies…





