I rise to clarify the congressional intent with respect to S. 880, the Chemical Safety Information, Site Security and Fuels Regulatory Relief Act of 1999, as we pass it and send it to the President. Balance between the right-to-know effect and risks of criminal activity (New section 112(r)(7)(H)(ii)): The amendment directs the President to promulgate regulations governing the disclosure of the off-site Consequence Analysis (OCA) information in a way that minimizes the likelihood of releases of the regulated chemicals, whether these releases are accidental or the result of criminal activity. In other words, the amendment calls for a balancing of the risk-reducing effect of public disclosure (the ``Right-to-Know Effect'') against the potential of increased risk of criminal activity associated with the posting of the OCA information on the Internet. Most importantly, reducing the threat of criminal activity is not the sole or even primary focus of the rule-making. Rather the objective is to minimize the release of regulated chemicals, which requires a balanced approach, and nothing in this Act necessarily precludes the eventual electronic dissemination of the information.
Frank Lautenberg: “I rise to clarify the congressional intent with respect to S. 880, the Chemical Safety Information, Site Security and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the intent and implications of the Chemical Safety Information Act during Senate debate.
Share
More from Frank Lautenberg
Republicans in the Congress continue to call for even deeper budget cuts--despite clear evidence that the austerity agenda they have championed has slowed the pace of job growth and needlessly increased the suffering of children, seniors…
I am deeply concerned that recent cuts to the IRS budget are jeopardizing its ability to carry out this vital mission.
Efforts to consolidate these grants could shift critical grant funds away from the areas most at-risk for a terror attack, like my State of New Jersey.
Do you consider IRS's current strategy for dealing with identity theft and refund fraud to be adequate? No.





