The fact is these agencies are not rogue organizations, they are creatures created by Congress and the executive branch. And if we have problems with the substance of the regulations, we should modify the underlying legislation. The Porter amendment would make Federal regulators more sensitive to takings without creating a new entitlement and would protect private property owners because the takings assessment mandated by the Porter amendment would be available to property owners. In this respect it goes further than the Reagan Executive order. So we should not pass the buck to regulatory agencies.
Dawn Zimmer: “The fact is these agencies are not rogue organizations, they are creatures created by Congress and the executive branch.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the role of federal agencies and the Porter amendment regarding property rights.
Share
More from Dawn Zimmer
This amendment assumes that the plaintiff gets the recovery and the plaintiff's attorney gets a piece of the action. Your amendment to the amendment would anticipate a situation where the defendant in fact would have a recovery? Or are you…
I wish I could say that we were wrong, but every day provides us with new evidence that we were right. In a period of declining NASA budgets, the space station, which is now estimated by the GAO to cost more than $94 billion, has already…
I would submit that items such as running boat landings, and campgrounds, and tourism simply are not the appropriate realm for government activity. I would submit that other activities that are covered by this cut, although they may be…
I thought he was something different. This week I found out he's cut from the same corrupt cloth that I had been fighting for the last four years.





