Mr. Chairman, some of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle are having some difficulty determining how truth in sentencing would apply to a 30,000-year term. It reminds me of the judge who sentenced a defendant to serve 100 years. The defendant said, ``But, Judge, I will never live that long.'' The judge said, ``Well, you just do the best you can.'' It is quite clear that a 30,000-year sentence would result in a life term for a prisoner. What this is about is gutting truth in sentencing. What this is about is prisoners who are sentenced ostensibly to 20 years who serve 3 years. The public does not want this, their Representatives in Congress do not want this. That is why I believe this amendment will fail.
Dawn Zimmer: “Mr. Chairman, some of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle are having some difficulty determining how truth in…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of truth in sentencing during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Dawn Zimmer
I want to alert my colleagues that later today I will be introducing a ``no frills'' prison amendment to this legislation. Simply put, this amendment will provide that prisoners in Federal prisons will be provided no more than the least…
I wish I could say that we were wrong, but every day provides us with new evidence that we were right. In a period of declining NASA budgets, the space station, which is now estimated by the GAO to cost more than $94 billion, has already…
I thank my colleague, Mr. Bilirakis , for once again arranging this special order on Cyprus. I join my colleagues in calling for a swift and peaceful end to the illegal occupation of nearly 40 percent of Cyprus by Turkey. That occupation…
the fact is these agencies are not rogue organizations, they are creatures created by Congress and the executive branch. And if we have problems with the substance of the regulations, we should modify the underlying legislation. The Porter…





