the current Congress can be broken into two groups: Those who think there is too much money in politics, and those who think there is not enough. I am of the former belief. During the 1996 election cycle, candidates running for Federal office spent over $1.6 billion to get elected. Whether we want to admit it or not, the fact is that our campaign finance system is jeopardizing our credibility. We should not fool ourselves into believing that the problem is only the illegal activities that occur during the campaigns. Soft money is unregulated and is not subject to any of the contribution limits. Democrats and Republicans combined to raise more than $260 million in soft money, a 206 percent increase, in 1992. If this trend is allowed to continue, we can expect the soft money figure to reach almost $1 billion in the year 2000. It is the abuse of soft money that has so badly tainted our system. It is soft money abuses that are the source of the investigations of the 1996 campaign.
Bill Pascrell: “the current Congress can be broken into two groups: Those who think there is too much money in politics, and those who…”
On the recordMay 22, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about campaign finance and the impact of soft money in politics.
Share
More from Bill Pascrell
May 7, 2024
I am proud to say that SAFER awarded more than $5 billion to departments to hire, recruit, and retain firefighters. These grants are amongst the most effective in the entire Federal budget. Fire departments rely on the Fire Administration…
Feb 5, 2024
In the wake of the COVID pandemic, we recognized the dire need for America to fix our supply chains.
Feb 29, 2024
I unintentionally missed one rollcall vote. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 57, H.R. 7102, the Native American Entrepreneurial Opportunity Act. Stated against: Mr. McCORMICK. Mr. Speaker, on rollcall No. 57…





