On the recordDecember 12, 2007
I'm glad we had that last exchange because that's the heart of the issue. It's disingenuous. It's almost bordering on hypocritical because from 2008 to 2017 the administration, the same administration that got us into this mess, assumes the revenue that we will be accepting from AMT every year. This is disingenuous. Tell the American people what the whole story is, not just half the story. What we want to do, Democrats, we want to prevent millions of working families, 100,000 in my own district, from seeing their taxes increase substantially. We're talking $3,000, $4,000. We're not talking chicken feed here. It pays for the lost revenue by stopping hedge fund managers and corporate CEOs from escaping income taxes by using offshore tax havens. I can only conclude from what I have heard this evening that the minority wants to protect tax evaders. That's what you want to do. Tell the American people straight up what you want to do. You don't want to protect the fireman, the police officer, the doctor, the lawyer. You want to protect that small group of people, you heard the Speaker talk about it, 5,000 to 10,000 people. That's what this protection scheme of yours is all about. Most Americans think what we're trying to do is fair and decent and reasonable because it is. But in the warped reality of Washington, there are Members of Congress who believe otherwise.
Source
govinfo.gov




