I would like to respond to my friend from Texas. We went through a period of time in the first decade of this century of U.S. prosecutors and attorneys looking at the subject of deferred prosecutions. I am talking about justice here. That is the bottom line. That is what we are talking about here. Instead of bringing corporations to trial that had violated the law-- and I am not an attorney. I am not the reason for two of my sons being attorneys, but I am not an attorney--they worked out a proposition. This is what they are trying to do, and this is what this is all about, if I could draw a comparison, which is you slap a corporation on the wrist, it pays a fine, and the fine becomes the cost of doing business. Mr. Speaker, this is going in the wrong direction. It is attacking a problem that does not exist instead of attacking a problem that does exist.
Share & report
More from Bill Pascrell
I rise for our first responders who are risking their lives and the lives of their families. They go to work every day to fight this virus. They need our help. I am proud to join Chairman Nadler, Congressman Max Rose, and others in support…
And they could build the hospitals and the schools and the roads. Where were they going to get the money if the Federal Government took all of the money to fight the war?
I want to state for the Record that, on April 15, 2021, I missed four roll call votes. Had I been present, I would have voted: yes--Roll Call Vote 113--on motion to suspend the rules and pass H.R. 1899; yes--Roll Call Vote 114--on motion…
Refusing a subpoena is obstructing justice. This is a vote of conscience. Do you agree with the rioting terrorists or our democracy? Are we a country of laws or a country of men? We must hold all involved accountable; this includes those…





