This bill takes steps backwards from offering full protections for women and children who suffer unspeakable abuse. I'm not questioning the intentions, Madam Speaker, of those on the other side; that's not my purpose here. But who are we excluding today? You're either a unifier on the floor or you are a divider. Instead of passing the bipartisan Senate bill that provides protections for women who are victims of abuse, the majority has decided instead to turn women's safety and security into a political fight. It shouldn't be. According to the 2010 National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, an average of 24 people per minute are victims of rape, physical violence, or stalking by an intimate partner. The Violence Against Women Act makes great strides. It shouldn't matter if a woman is an immigrant or a member of the LGBT community. I'm against this rule. I'm against the bill. I hope we can come together on a final resolution of this.
Share & report
More from Bill Pascrell
At the Joint Select Committee on Solvency of Multiemployer Pension Plans hearing last year, my constituent Carol Podesta-Smallen said that her monthly benefits were on the verge of being cut by 61 percent--read that--from $2,600 to $1,022…
``The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice,'' Martin Luther King said. I want to thank Chairwoman Bass, Chairman Nadler, and Senator Booker for their leadership on this landmark piece of legislation. We stand here…
I support this legislation, H.R. 748. During our discussions on health reform in 2009, many of us strongly opposed the excise tax on so-called Cadillac employer-provided health plans. We were successful in keeping it out of the House…
On June 23, 2021, I missed one roll call vote. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yes'' on rollcall vote 175--Motion on Ordering the Previous Question on the Rule, H. Res. 486. members recorded pursuant to house resolution 8, 117th…





