I feel that is very irresponsible. In fact, I considered offering an amendment which would address the underlying question you are raising which is the much more fundamental question of the issue of unfunded mandates. This is not the core issue of what is and is not an unfunded mandate. I think we are confusing it in the debates right now. What this gets to is the fine issue. There is this other core issue, and I hope it is going to be taken up at some point in this Congress because I know there are a lot of bills floating around on the issue, and some have significant sponsorship. But that is not the issue that is being adjudicated by this amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the issue of unfunded mandates during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Sen. Judd Gregg
To get back to the Senator's prior question, I believe my answer was accurate. If you look at the definition, you will see, if the funding is available, the capacity is there to assess the fine. If the community decides it does not want to…
It is very specific. It says quality, availability of curriculum instruction, materials and technology. That is not designing math courses. That is saying whether or not you are going to teach Euclidean geometry or some other type of…
My reaction is it's a genuine and sincere effort to try to free up the credit markets and especially to balance and get balance into the real estate markets which is at the core of the financial problems.
Nobody is satisfied with what is happening in education. That is unquestionably the case. We are all very concerned that as a Nation our children are not able to compete in the international economy or the global marketplace. But the way…





