It is very specific. It says quality, availability of curriculum instruction, materials and technology. That is not designing math courses. That is saying whether or not you are going to teach Euclidean geometry or some other type of geometry. One could come to that conclusion. If they wanted to get to the point that the Senator from Kansas had wanted to get to, which is to set a standard to make sure all third graders know multiplication and all eighth graders know algebra I, if they wanted to get to that, they could have done it without having to go to methodology. They could have done it by assessment. But this is a methodology bill, not an assessment bill in that section. I must disagree with the Senator's evaluation of the impact of the bill.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the implications of a bill related to educational standards and methodology.
Share
More from Sen. Judd Gregg
If funds are available and there is a contractual obligation, it seems to me the fine is assessed.
I rise in support of the Lott amendment and to address briefly at this time the budget as presented by the President. If you look at the budget presented by the President, it is, regrettably, a budget that is really a stand-pat budget on…
this amendment addresses the issues which have been talked about at some length already today on this bill, which are the opportunity-to-learn standards. I think that issue should be reviewed a little bit so everybody understands what we…
I must respond briefly to the Senator from California, because I believe it is a bit unusual for those who are not actually drinking the water to expect that they are going to have even a higher level of concern about the water than those…





