Nobody is satisfied with what is happening in education. That is unquestionably the case. We are all very concerned that as a Nation our children are not able to compete in the international economy or the global marketplace. But the way you would address that is not to penalize the system. The way you address that is by giving more autonomy to your local schools, teachers, and parents to develop and educate the children in a manner which will reach the goals we have outlined. You give them the assessment standards necessary to accomplish that and to test themselves. You do not tell them how to do the methodology of teaching. You tell them the outcome of what it should be. I would suggest what the efforts should be to allow them to make their own assessment whether their children are being educated well and competitively. But this bill does not do that. This bill does just the opposite.
Editor's note · Context
Speaker addresses concerns about education reform and local autonomy in schools.
Share
More from Sen. Judd Gregg
To get back to the Senator's prior question, I believe my answer was accurate. If you look at the definition, you will see, if the funding is available, the capacity is there to assess the fine. If the community decides it does not want to…
if we are going to get into the issue of hyperbole, because this appears to be the movement of this debate, let me simply point out all those folks who are listening in on Senators, everyone who has sponsored an unfunded mandates bill--and…
I wish to commend the Senator for his initiative, and I can understand the concern of the Senator from Hawaii about being familiar with the specifics. I acknowledge the fact that this has been publicly presented. I believe it was last…
I would presume--and we are getting into some hypotheticals, which I think is worth getting into, and I think the answers so far have reflected the fact this is a legitimate amendment that is not going to destroy the bill, but is just…





