this amendment addresses the issues which have been talked about at some length already today on this bill, which are the opportunity-to-learn standards. I think that issue should be reviewed a little bit so everybody understands what we are talking about. What this amendment does is essentially eliminate the opportunity-to-learn standards. Now that does not fundamentally undermine the bill, to eliminate those standards. Let us talk about what this bill does. This bill first and foremost sets out the goals--which were agreed to with a couple of additions at the Charlottsville Governors Conference, as called by President Bush and which, of course, then Governor Clinton was the chairman of the Governors Conference and was a major player in designing those goals, which goals, everybody agrees, are excellent and very appropriate--and takes those goals and makes them the goals of the Nation as designed by this bill, Goals 2,000. In addition, the bill, in an attempt to address those goals, sets out a variety of steps. It creates a fund which is available to the States to try to set up plans for the purposes of designing school systems and assisting in developing school systems within the States which meet the goals of the Nation as set forth at the Governors Conference.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses an amendment related to opportunity-to-learn standards in education legislation.
Share
More from Sen. Judd Gregg
I feel that is very irresponsible. In fact, I considered offering an amendment which would address the underlying question you are raising which is the much more fundamental question of the issue of unfunded mandates. This is not the core…
if we are going to get into the issue of hyperbole, because this appears to be the movement of this debate, let me simply point out all those folks who are listening in on Senators, everyone who has sponsored an unfunded mandates bill--and…
My reaction is it's a genuine and sincere effort to try to free up the credit markets and especially to balance and get balance into the real estate markets which is at the core of the financial problems.
I would presume--and we are getting into some hypotheticals, which I think is worth getting into, and I think the answers so far have reflected the fact this is a legitimate amendment that is not going to destroy the bill, but is just…





