If the Senator will yield to me for an answer, I hope I did not in any way imply that she is not committed to local control. As a former school board member, I am sure she is, but the practical impact of this bill--obviously, I disagree with her sense of where it goes. I do not think it is a worst case example I am talking about. This language is very specific. I refer the Senator from Kansas back to section 211.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is discussing the implications of a bill related to local control in education.
Share
More from Sen. Judd Gregg
Nobody is satisfied with what is happening in education. That is unquestionably the case. We are all very concerned that as a Nation our children are not able to compete in the international economy or the global marketplace. But the way…
So the appropriate manner in which this body functions requires us to bring it forth today. I certainly congratulate the Senator from Nebraska for his energy and initiative in putting this package together and bringing together a large…
I feel that is very irresponsible. In fact, I considered offering an amendment which would address the underlying question you are raising which is the much more fundamental question of the issue of unfunded mandates. This is not the core…
To get back to the Senator's prior question, I believe my answer was accurate. If you look at the definition, you will see, if the funding is available, the capacity is there to assess the fine. If the community decides it does not want to…





