I do echo Senator Casey's comments about the importance of being clear with the American people about what our strategy is there and what we hope to accomplish.

Shouldn't the goal of our oversight of markets be to avoid or prevent the kind of manipulation that we saw over the last year, regardless of whether there was intent involved or not?

As you know the Energy Policy Act of 2005 authorized the Secretary of Energy to guarantee loans of up to 80 percent of construction costs for energy projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, including nuclear power.

One of the things that I think drove up the cost of Seabrook was the fact that Three Mile Island happened in the middle of that construction.

New Hampshire, as you may know, is home to the Seabrook nuclear power plant, which I believe was the last power plant licensed in the United States and actually constructed and operating.

How many reactors do you think it would take to get to those economies of scale?

I think it's worth exploring.

A $6,500 cap is a challenge for many of those homes.

The $5 billion that was included in the Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Act for weatherization, I think is a very important investment.

Now, one of the reasons that we require competitive suppliers to do it is because, when I was Governor, New Hampshire restructured its electric industry to make generation of power a competitive function.

I certainly agree with several of you who have talked about the need to move this country in a new energy direction that uses more clean energy technologies and that that's not only an environmental imperative and a national security…

I think that a renewable portfolio standard could be essential to doing that.