it would be difficult to overstate the historical significance of the Louisiana Purchase. Looking back, it is difficult to imagine a single land purchase which doubled the size of this Nation, and it is equally hard to imagine what America might look like today had that purchase not been made. We support the findings and sentiments expressed in this concurrent resolution and support its adoption.
Jon L. Christensen: “it would be difficult to overstate the historical significance of the Louisiana Purchase. Looking back, it is difficult…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the historical significance of the Louisiana Purchase.
Share
More from Jon L. Christensen
what we're hearing about the SCHIP negotiations sounds like this Congress is getting ready to literally throw the baby out with the bathwater. We started with a less than perfect bill that would have covered close to 6 million children who…
H. Res. 16 would grant the recognition of the House to Virginia's James River as ``America's Founding River.'' The resolution was introduced by our colleague, Representative Jo Ann Davis of Virginia. The James River rises in the Allegheny…
in 1790, the Non-Intercourse Act was enacted reserving the right to acquire land, or an interest in land, owned by an Indian tribe in the United States. It was intended to prevent third parties from taking advantage of Indians by…
I rise in support of H.R. 2643, the proposed Fiscal Year 2008 appropriations for the Department of Interior, Environment, and other related agencies. I commend Chairman Norman Dicks, and his Appropriations Subcommittee for the work he has…





