H.R. 1630 as it is being brought to the floor today is not the same bill that passed the Committee on Resources in July. An issue was raised by the majority on the acquisition of the private lands within the park, but I am pleased that the language has been worked out and that it is language that is acceptable to both sides. So, Mr. Speaker, we will support this new amended version of H.R. 1630. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Jon L. Christensen: “H.R. 1630 as it is being brought to the floor today is not the same bill that passed the Committee on Resources in July.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the amended version of H.R. 1630 during House floor debate.
Share
More from Jon L. Christensen
But this was our 37th Annual Legislative Conference, and our theme, as you heard, was ``Unleashing Our Power.'' That is also exactly what we here in the CBC and our constituents across the country intend to do going forward, unleash our…
in 1790, the Non-Intercourse Act was enacted reserving the right to acquire land, or an interest in land, owned by an Indian tribe in the United States. It was intended to prevent third parties from taking advantage of Indians by…
I rise in support of H.R. 3658, to amend the Foreign Service Act of 1980 to permit rest and recuperation travel to United States territories for members of the Foreign Service, sponsored by my good friend and neighbor, Mr. Fortuno of…
what we're hearing about the SCHIP negotiations sounds like this Congress is getting ready to literally throw the baby out with the bathwater. We started with a less than perfect bill that would have covered close to 6 million children who…





