I rise today in support of H.R. 2, which repeals the job-destroying government takeover of health care. Voters rejected the ``government knows best'' philosophy in November. In contrast, Republicans believe that American innovation and reduced government control are keys to successful health reform that reduces health care costs. For instance, it's estimated that 1 percent of the most seriously ill account for more than 25 percent of all health care expenditures. What if we could improve the care of these patients and at the same time reduce costs? We can. We can by harnessing the power of innovation and health research in fields like regenerative medicine. Regenerative medicine develops technologies to replace or regenerate organs and tissues using the patient's own cells. These treatments could reduce the cost of chronic diseases by $275 billion a year. Consider the fact that Dr. Anthony Atala at the Institute for Regenerative Medicine at Wake Forest University has been able successfully to grow bladders for bladder replacement surgeries from the recipient's own cells. Yet despite several successful bladder transplants, the FDA insists he go through additional clinical trials on animals and spend millions of dollars in testing that is clearly unnecessary based on his success with the human transplant surgeries.
On the recordJanuary 19, 2011
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
The speaker supports the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and advocates for innovation in health care.
Share
More from Virginia Foxx
Jul 18, 2025
The money that we’re clawing back in this rescissions package is the people’s money. We ought not to forget that.
Nov 13, 2025
I am sick and tired of hearing you all say we had an eight-week vacation. I worked every day
Dec 5, 2024
The Biden-Harris Education Department has once again failed America's hardworking taxpayers. For 3 years in a row, the Education Department failed its audit. In other words, the Education Department has been unable to manage effectively…
Dec 9, 2024
I think my colleagues on both sides have done a good job of expressing our concerns about the status of reforms and performance of the Post Office.





