This amendment is a weak attempt to lend lip service to employee privacy, but it fails to reduce the PRO Act's invasion of workers' personal lives. Simply because this amendment says the bill shall not be construed to affect employee privacy does not make it so. This amendment will not affect the PRO Act's mandate forcing employers to share employees' home addresses, home phone numbers, cell phone numbers, personal email addresses, and more with union organizers without giving workers any say in the matter or ensuring that their personal information is protected. The PRO Act's provision is an invasion of privacy, and empty rhetoric in this fig leaf amendment does nothing to fix this harmful mandate. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Share
More from Virginia Foxx
I am going to take a little time to address the importance of the No Rogue Rulings Act and why the American people are demanding action against this unchecked abuse of nationwide injunctions. The fact is activist liberal judges have been…
Last night, the Rules Committee met and produced a rule, House Resolution 294, providing for consideration of four measures: S.J. Res. 18, disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to…
By the direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 242 and ask for its immediate consideration. The Clerk read the resolution, as follows: H. Res. 242 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order…
It gives California unilateral authority to cram its ‘comply or die’ zero-emission truck rule down the throats of every American.





