I first want to make it clear I am opposed to allowing tax increases to go into effect on January 1. However, I am also opposed to this rule and the underlying bill. It's very interesting to hear our colleagues on the other side of the aisle arguing against the tax bill before us today because of their concerns that we're adding to the deficit. We didn't hear those arguments when they were voting for the trillion-dollar stimulus and all the other trillions they have voted for in the past 4 years. In fact, their stories and those of the President have changed dramatically over the past few days. ... Democrats fought to keep the Bush tax rates only for those making less than $250,000 in a year. That is curious, since they've been saying for about 10 years that the 'Bush tax cuts' went only to the wealthiest Americans. Democrats are arguing to keep something they said never existed. So we find our friends again on the other side of the aisle flip-flopping on this issue.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses opposition to tax increases and criticizes Democrats for their changing stance on tax cuts.
Share
More from Virginia Foxx
I think my colleagues on both sides have done a good job of expressing our concerns about the status of reforms and performance of the Post Office.
I also rise to recognize Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers, who is retiring at the end of the 118th Congress. In 2004, the two of us came to the House in the same class, and we have been friends throughout our time here. Cathy has the…
I am going to take a little time to address the importance of the No Rogue Rulings Act and why the American people are demanding action against this unchecked abuse of nationwide injunctions. The fact is activist liberal judges have been…
Thank you so much my colleague from Texas and all the people who have come here to praise Dr. Michael Burgess. I join them in recognizing him on his pending retirement. For over two decades, he has more than ably represented the people of…





