Thom Tillis actually said...

"The Government at one point defended the statute by saying it could prevent the publication of a book by a corporation like Random House if the book advocated for or against a candidate."

"They painted a picture of this case as support for big money in politics where big corporations win and the voter loses."

"I find it curious my friends are so concerned about Executive power and not concerned about the Federal Government arguing its authority to prevent production of movies, books, and pamphlets."

"I will ask my colleagues to do what Republicans did before I have here: respect the President's right to seat somebody on the Supreme Court."