On the recordMarch 19, 2017
The Government at one point defended the statute by saying it could prevent the publication of a book by a corporation like Random House if the book advocated for or against a candidate.
Source
congress.govThe Government at one point defended the statute by saying it could prevent the publication of a book by a corporation like Random House if the book advocated for or against a candidate.
Discussing the implications of government restrictions on political expression.
Share
More from Thom Tillis
I'm trying to get to yes, but this is a very important part of getting to yes.
“Maybe it’s a little bit more intense in this administration than the last one, and that a little bit more intense in the prior administration, and so on and so forth,”
the best way to do this is to end it by renegotiating the agreement and settling it for good.