On the recordApril 15, 2013
Ending Dodd-Frank would take us back to a future without the tools to deal with 'too-big-to-fail.'
Source
congress.govEnding Dodd-Frank would take us back to a future without the tools to deal with 'too-big-to-fail.'
McHenry argues against repealing Dodd-Frank, citing risks of 'too-big-to-fail' banks.
Share
More from Pat McHenry
Broad and material changes to the Basel III Endgame necessitate a full reproposal. Full stop.
That lack of transparency and accountability raises concerns about the extent to which other countries are influencing financial regulation here in the United States.
This is a matter of real substance for the independence of the Fed and the rulemaking at the Federal Reserve.