I have heard the gentleman say two or three times that this is subject to appropriation. I am trying to figure out what that means, because if somebody goes into court and gets a judgment against an agency of the United States of America, and that judgment is in effect in the courts of this country against the United States, how can we not appropriate the money and get out of that unless this is simply a false promise to property owners. I do not understand how we could as a nation with integrity say that somebody can get a judgment under a law, your law in this case, this law that we are debating today, and then turn around and say no, we are not creating any obligation to pay that judgment.
Melvin Watt: “I have heard the gentleman say two or three times that this is subject to appropriation. I am trying to figure out what…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of appropriations related to court judgments against U.S. agencies.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
if you look at my record throughout my whole life, from the day I started in the practice of law in a civil rights law firm, you will find nobody, or few people, who are more committed to the things that you all have talked about today.
This is definitely the last time I will be addressing this House. As my colleague, David Price, has indicated, I have been confirmed to a new position as regulator and director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. I just wanted to take a…
I don't think there is any question that somebody who gets good homeownership counseling, either pre-ownership, or in some cases post-ownership--it makes them better borrowers.
For the record, I neglected to indicate in my comments that our colleague, the chair of the subcommittee, announced last week during the period that we were out on the Veterans Day district work period that he was not planning to run for…





