I rise in opposition to particularly the last part of this amendment. It really is a real disservice to mutual policyholders, who are owners of the insurance company. To allow an insurance company to take the assets and convert to a stock company puts those policyholders at a real disadvantage. Now, I had some experience with this. The last case that I ever handled in the practice of law was one of these cases where a mutual company, without the authorization of the insureds, tried to do this very thing. They ended up understating the value of the assets. They were not going to give the insurance policyholders one dime until we got involved, and they ended up paying them millions of dollars. I think this is a bad idea, and we should vote against this amendment.
Melvin Watt: “I rise in opposition to particularly the last part of this amendment. It really is a real disservice to mutual…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to the conversion of mutual insurance companies to stock companies.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
I thank the gentleman for yielding time. Mr. Chairman, I want to rise not so much in opposition to the manager's amendment, but in opposition to the bill and so that we can try to make sure that people understand what it is that they are…
I simply wanted to rise and pay tribute to the memory of my dear friend and colleague, Major Owens, who passed last week. I express my condolences to his family. As new Members, we take for granted sometimes that there is a system in place…
There is no rational reason, if you think about it, why a superior tax lien would be having an interest rate of 10, 11, 12 percent when a lien subordinate to it is going at 4 percent or 5 percent.
I think the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage has become a standard for American homeowners, and it is important to retain that.





