I will give him the same assurance. And I said it in my statement because I just got the gentleman's amendment yesterday or the day before, and I confess that my amendment to his amendment may not accomplish everything that both of us are trying to accomplish either, which is why I said we are going to have to continue to work on this, and I am certainly willing to continue to work with him. I understand exactly what the gentleman is trying to achieve. We share that objective. But we want to make sure that the concerns I raise don't get washed up in the ``knowingly'' term that the gentleman used.
Melvin Watt: “I will give him the same assurance. And I said it in my statement because I just got the gentleman's amendment yesterday…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing collaboration on amendments during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
The real problem was that I think because there was this competition to make money for the private sector, there developed a race to the bottom.
What was needed in this industry was somebody to make responsible decisions and not let access overburden safety and soundness.
unequivocally . . . it is the role of Congress, not FHFA, to make the decisions that chart the path out of conservatorship and to the future housing finance system.
I demand a recorded vote. The CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from North Carolina will be postponed. Amendment No. 3 Offered by Mr. Polis The CHAIR. It is now in…





