the gentleman is focusing on what I struck out of the bill, but he needs to focus on what I put back in the bill, because I put a lot of his very language back in the bill. We are encouraging the obtaining of this goal by encouragement of the Federal, State and local governments, by promoting and protecting the independent and collective actions of private citizens, organizations and the private sector, the very same things the gentleman has said. I did not take these things out and not put them back in. They are in this amendment, and I am encouraging the gentleman to read my amendment and agree to it.
Melvin Watt: “the gentleman is focusing on what I struck out of the bill, but he needs to focus on what I put back in the bill…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendments to a bill and addressing concerns raised by a colleague.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
Woman, I thank the gentleman for yielding. I am pained to be here today in opposition to this bill. I stood shoulder to shoulder with the chair of our full committee 2 years ago in patent reform after working almost 6 years to find…
This is in line with my consistently repeated belief that it is the role of Congress, not FHFA, to decide on housing finance reform.
I demand a recorded vote. The CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from North Carolina will be postponed. Amendment No. 3 Offered by Mr. Polis The CHAIR. It is now in…
I would certainly emphasize that if anybody here has the notion that I believe that I am above the law, they should dissuade themselves of that notion.





