The gentleman from South Carolina concluded his remarks by saying this amendment ``would affect that'' and provided no specification for ``that.'' Look, this was just about national security. We didn't get two words in response to the substance of this amendment. We got a bunch of platitudes that were completely unrelated. I was under the assumption, given everything we had heard about national emergencies and national security, that making sure that the Strategic Petroleum Reserve could be used for national security used to be bipartisan. If not, there would be a good reason as to why that exception should not exist. We didn't get a one. We got a speech about hurricanes. We got a speech about other uses for oil. I hear you. I am on board. This is national security. The fact that you had no response whatsoever tells me your bill isn't serious. This bill is about messaging. You are looking to tie any future President's hands in a way that is fundamentally reckless. If this bill were serious, you would take national security more seriously. Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. Members are reminded to address their remarks to the Chair.
On the recordJanuary 27, 2023
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from Jeff Jackson
Jul 1, 2026
This settlement makes sure they can’t rig the market anymore, and food banks in our state will get millions of eggs to help feed people who are hungry.
Nov 15, 2023
I have been a Member of Congress for about 11 months, and I want to give my constituents a quick update on some of the bipartisan work that we have done. Our office has been able to bring about $90 million back into the district. A big…
Sep 19, 2024
If Mark Robinson wins this race, it will be the biggest upset in my lifetime.
Jul 12, 2023
A Senator from Alabama is now many months into a blockade of all the generals and admirals in our military who are scheduled to advance in their leadership. This is no longer just a political statement from him. This is a national security…





