the FDA defense is simple and it is fair. If the Food and Drug Administration approves a drug, then the pharmaceutical company which manufactures that drug should not be liable for punitive damages. Currently the fear of unnecessary litigations stifles innovations and limits the types of drugs which are available to the American consumer. Without the FDA defense, beneficial drugs will be driven out of the marketplace and manufacturers will continue to be discouraged from developing new drugs to treat illnesses such as AIDS and cancer. I urge my colleagues to support the amendment.
Fred Heineman: “the FDA defense is simple and it is fair. If the Food and Drug Administration approves a drug, then the pharmaceutical…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for FDA defense to encourage pharmaceutical innovation.
Share
More from Fred Heineman
today I am pleased that the House is poised to pass my bill, H.R. 1499, the Telemarketing Fraud Punishment and Prevention Act of 1996. H.R. 1499 protects senior citizens from a sophisticated type of white collar criminal--telemarketing…
I introduced H.R. 3852, the Comprehensive Methamphetamine Control Act of 1996 because of the growing scourge of meth. Senator Hatch introduced companion legislation, S. 1965, which passed the Senate earlier this month. Meth, commonly known…
I thank the gentleman, and let me at this point say this is a bipartisan effort, as I see it, and I thank my colleagues from law enforcement on both sides of the aisle for going to bat and swinging the bat at the ball to get him the help…
Mr. Chairman, we hear the talk about the exclusionary rule, and I do not think we have had much dialog about the warrant search, the search under the authority of a warrant, other than having Leon explain to us on two occasions. What we…





