the majority intends to cut Medicare by $270 million. They have not yet told us what they will cut and how they will cut it, to reach that goal. And, they may not tell us until they have to tell us, just before this fiscal year ends in September. But, in a recent article in the Washington Times, we did learn what some in the majority are thinking--they want to privatize Medicare. If Medicare is privatized, the cost to senior citizens will be out of control. The majority apparently insists upon giving to the wealthy and taking from the old. It is clear that if the majority would not push for a tax break for wealthy Americans, they would not have to push for a Medicare cut for our senior citizens. I suppose when you have the votes to win, you can giveth and you can taketh away. But, power and justice are not synonymous. Let us seek justice. Let us spare Medicare.
Eva M. Clayton: “the majority intends to cut Medicare by $270 million. They have not yet told us what they will cut and how they will cut…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing proposed cuts to Medicare and the implications of privatization during a floor speech.
Share
More from Eva M. Clayton
the other part of the Conyers amendment spoke to the civil rights issues both in the equity and distribution of Farm Services that are administered through Farm Services, whether they are loans, technical assistance or environmental…
we have many unemployed persons in my district. In North Carolina alone we have 28,000 people who have exhausted their insurance already. We have experienced an increase of 105 percent in unemployment. We need to stop the bickering, stop…
I am quoting from a recent report called, ``A Future With Hope,'' prepared by Bread for the World. It says, under the policy to address world hunger, and I quote, ``The terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, profoundly affected the United…
the plight of the Black Farmers continues to be fragile and uncertain in spite of the Black Farmer's Law Suit or because of it. The recent ruling by the U.S. Appellant Court in Washington, DC. Pigford v. Ann M. Veneman'', clearly said that…





