The other part of the Conyers amendment spoke to the civil rights issues both in the equity and distribution of Farm Services that are administered through Farm Services, whether they are loans, technical assistance or environmental programs. The array of programs we give all farmers. We wanted public record of that so that we knew that that would be going to all farmers equitably, without regard to race, without regard to gender or size. The second part of that was a fair distribution of the election of the committee. My understanding on that was that we would have hearings to vet that and come to see how we could get a more fair representation on the committee and have some public disclosure on how public funds were being spent in various counties. Am I correct in my understanding?
Eva M. Clayton: “The other part of the Conyers amendment spoke to the civil rights issues both in the equity and distribution of Farm…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing civil rights issues related to the distribution of Farm Services.
Share
More from Eva M. Clayton
We have engaged in this conversation before, but we wanted to make sure that as we address all issues we paid special attention to rural America. Each of a State's governors have to submit a plan to the Secretary stating how they are going…
We are simply trying to raise their sensitivity with this. I just think people of good conscience cannot look at the epidemic and turn away. If you do, it says just volumes about where you are not, not where you are.
That is an interesting observation. I was reading something on the United Nations report. Poverty and HIV are related. AIDS is not a disease of poverty, but they become intertwined and connected because having AIDS moves one to the point…
I am very appreciative of what the gentleman has done. I am only saying as a rural-urban allocation, those of us who live in rural communities do not benefit from the program in the same way. I urge the gentleman to work with us during the…





