I would suggest that though that has happened, they also included very specific language, wherein my amendment is very broadly structured to include workplace safety. This is consistent with the language, that the gentleman has said that it will not, indeed, jeopardize the safety and health of Americans. Therefore, if the gentleman means that, it simply says that the gentleman would include that. This is not inconsistent with what the gentleman is saying. He is just not putting it into the language.
Eva M. Clayton: “I would suggest that though that has happened, they also included very specific language, wherein my amendment is very…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the inclusion of workplace safety in legislative language.
Share
More from Eva M. Clayton
What we have seen, indeed we have no other choice, they say, other than to raid Social Security, and indeed we had a choice. We had a choice. We could have paid down the debt. Paying down the public debt would have allowed to us to protect…
I was about to ask the gentleman if he is suggesting that he would be willing to restate it, all the legal immigrants, plus your provision, if they had some standard? Is that a 5-year standard, a 4-year standard?
I can say unequivocally, though, that every member of the Congressional Black Caucus has made this a centerpiece, a priority, in this Congress as well as Congresses before and Congresses to come, because this is a very critical issue. And…
We are simply trying to raise their sensitivity with this. I just think people of good conscience cannot look at the epidemic and turn away. If you do, it says just volumes about where you are not, not where you are.





