this amendment says very simply that we will not use the taxpayers' money to solicit people to come into the SSI program, which we are doing, and spending massive amounts of taxpayers' dollars to solicit people to come and sign up for SSI benefits. We are doing it through mailing, advertising, and even door-to-door solicitation with people who are hired and paid by the Federal Government. SSI outreach programs are used to try to maximize participation in the SSI program. I believe we owe it to the American people to assure them that we are using the hard-earned dollars that we spend on welfare programs only to provide assistance to the truly needy and that we are not out spending more of their money and hiring bureaucrats to solicit people to come get their money. So this is a very simple program. It forbids the use of Federal funds for the recruitment of people into the SSI program. I do not think we should be hiring people to solicit people to come get welfare.
Duncan Faircloth: “this amendment says very simply that we will not use the taxpayers' money to solicit people to come into the SSI…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to prohibit using taxpayer money for SSI program recruitment.
Share
More from Duncan Faircloth
I would like to ask everyone to take a moment to look at the most important stamp ever issued in our history, and that is the one we have the painting of here on the easel. I joined the U.S. Postal Service in unveiling this stamp in Chapel…
We have detailed every dime of the expenditure, and now we have opposition to detailing the attorney fees.
Recent Congressional debates over federal regulatory programs, such as the revised particulate matter standard, and the criteria for listing new species under the Endangered Species Act, show the importance of providing the public with…
We have been on this now for several hours, and we have come down to two things: Should we abrogate contracts or not? They say they are contracts with these attorneys, they have made these contracts. Well, maybe they have. But we are…





