Recent Congressional debates over federal regulatory programs, such as the revised particulate matter standard, and the criteria for listing new species under the Endangered Species Act, show the importance of providing the public with full access to federal research data to validate research results and gain the proper public support. The importance of this issue is also reflected in a recent court decision on environmental tobacco smoke that concluded that the Environmental Protection Agency had been selective in including research data in its overall assessment of health risks. Public access to research data would help ensure that federal rules are based on the best science possible.
Duncan Faircloth: “Recent Congressional debates over federal regulatory programs, such as the revised particulate matter standard, and the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of public access to federal research data during a debate on regulatory programs.
Share
More from Duncan Faircloth
If they submit a record, they will have to submit a record to the Congress. And of course it would be perjury to lie about it. They have to submit the record. Yes, I am saying they are going to be held responsible. And to the same fees…
I beg to correct you. It comes from the taxpayers of this country. The tax is on cigarettes and cigarettes are smoked by generally people with incomes of less than $40,000 to $50,000 a year. They are going to pay 70 percent of this tax. We…
It is difficult to see $185,000 an hour paid to plaintiffs' attorneys that come out of the working people of this country, too. And that bothers me considerably.
We have detailed every dime of the expenditure, and now we have opposition to detailing the attorney fees.





