We are now debating a provision of the Dole bill that addresses illegitimacy but is not at all directive or proscriptive. The provision which the amendment by Senator Jeffords seeks to strike is a simple provision that rewards a State for reducing its illegitimacy ratio, the percentage of total births which are out of wedlock. This provision taken from the House welfare reform bill says if a State decreases its illegitimacy ratio without increasing its abortion rate, we will increase the AFDC block grant by up to 10 percent. That is what we all agree that we want. We want a reduction in out-of-wedlock births as long as it is not accomplished by an increase in abortions. We do not tell the States how to reduce illegitimacy. We simply say, ``You come up with a successful way to reduce it, and we will give you more money.'' The provision has three elements. We set a goal: reducing illegitimacy. We give the States maximum flexibility in meeting that goal. Third, we provide a financial reward for meeting the goal.
Duncan Faircloth: “We are now debating a provision of the Dole bill that addresses illegitimacy but is not at all directive or…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a provision of the Dole bill related to reducing out-of-wedlock births.
Share
More from Duncan Faircloth
I think the Senator has a workable plan to move this toward a solution, and I urge the Department of the Interior and the District Government to study the matter and report back to us early next year.
as you know there has been severe financial turmoil in Asia. This has lead to a dramatic increase in the trade deficit. It is my understanding that exports from Asian nations are up significantly, particularly with respect to textiles…
We limit attorneys' fees to every other attorney under the Equal Access to Justice Act. We limit to $125 attorney fees against the Federal Government in civil rights cases. Now, maybe they are less important than the tobacco case, but they…
There is great conversation that we are going into these attorney settlements with tobacco companies; that that is wrong; that we shouldn't do that; we are interfering in a private contract. Yet, we are telling the tobacco companies…





