There is great conversation that we are going into these attorney settlements with tobacco companies; that that is wrong; that we shouldn't do that; we are interfering in a private contract. Yet, we are telling the tobacco companies, without any question, cancel your contracts in advertising, whether it is television, billboards, newspapers, racetracks. All those you cancel. You go back and retroactively do it. And because we are trying to set caps on attorneys' fees, they say we are interfering in the private sector. What is the other part of the bill?
Duncan Faircloth: “There is great conversation that we are going into these attorney settlements with tobacco companies; that that is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of attorney settlements with tobacco companies.
Share
More from Duncan Faircloth
In the light of the recent terrorist attacks on U.S. soil, our Nation's growing problem with drug smuggling and even the proliferation for weapons of mass destruction, it would be a tragedy if we did not take full advantage of the best…
I wish to thank you for agreeing to include an amendment to the FY 1999 DoD Appropriations bill that directs the Department of Defense (DoD) to immediately obligate all of the funds which Congress has mandated be used for a fair, and…
Furthermore, I believe that the Defense Department should take whatever steps are necessary to transfer full administrative and operational responsibility for the PFNA program to the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). It is my…
I beg to correct you. It comes from the taxpayers of this country. The tax is on cigarettes and cigarettes are smoked by generally people with incomes of less than $40,000 to $50,000 a year. They are going to pay 70 percent of this tax. We…





