this amendment would very simply express the sense of the Senate that if we enact a balanced budget plan this year--that such legislation should also contain a strategy for reducing the national debt. The budget resolution we are debating today is a plan to balance the budget by the year 2002. But by the year 2002, our national debt will be $6.5 trillion. Mr. President, this debt represents a massive burden on the American people and future generations of Americans. I am deeply concerned about this debt burden that we have placed on our children, grandchildren, and children yet born. The budget resolution is a plan to end the deficit spending--which is certainly what we need. But I feel just as strongly that we need a plan to reduce this debt. It took this country nearly 200 years to accumulate a debt of $1 trillion--and in the last 16 years the debt will have increased fivefold. This is not a Republican or Democrat issue--we don't need to assign the blame--we just need to develop a solution. All this amendment would do is encourage the Senate--express that it is our sense that we develop proposals to deal with this massive debt burden.
Duncan Faircloth: “this amendment would very simply express the sense of the Senate that if we enact a balanced budget plan this year--that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a balanced budget plan that includes a strategy for reducing national debt.
Share
More from Duncan Faircloth
This would include space at a port of entry or border crossing where a test might be conducted. Once this is done, I hope that ONDCP and the Customs Service will provide the committee with a recommendation on the strategy to guide the…
So, Mr. President, who are these ``superman'' lawyers who deserve to be paid more than 20,000 times the salary of a working American? Well, one of them is Hugh Rodham, the President's brother-in-law. He is on line to get $50 million as a…
There is great conversation that we are going into these attorney settlements with tobacco companies; that that is wrong; that we shouldn't do that; we are interfering in a private contract. Yet, we are telling the tobacco companies…
It is difficult to see $185,000 an hour paid to plaintiffs' attorneys that come out of the working people of this country, too. And that bothers me considerably.





