I am proud to support the Small Business Regulatory Fairness Act as a cosponsor. Before I was elected to the Senate in 1992, I spent more than 40 years in the private sector as a farmer and a businessman. I know firsthand how hard it is to run a small business successfully, and how much harder it has become due to burdensome Government regulations. It is only fair that we recognize the limited resources of small businesses, and the need to provide the small business community with greater access to the regulatory process. This bill contains important provisions that encourage comment from small business on proposed regulations; promote easier compliance with regulatory requirements; provide that regulations be explained in a way that they can be understood by small businessmen, not just by bureaucrats; and offer improved protection for small business from punitive or capricious actions by regulators. It is encouraging that this effort to provide greater consideration for small business in the regulatory process is a bipartisan effort. Many of the provisions in this bill are based on recommendations from last year's White House Conference on Small Business. The staging of this conference is a noteworthy exception to the hostility that the Clinton administration has otherwise shown to small business. Hillary Clinton built her health care plan around an employer mandate that would have devastated small business.
Duncan Faircloth: “I am proud to support the Small Business Regulatory Fairness Act as a cosponsor. Before I was elected to the Senate in…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting the Small Business Regulatory Fairness Act and addressing regulatory burdens on small businesses.
Share
More from Duncan Faircloth
There is great conversation that we are going into these attorney settlements with tobacco companies; that that is wrong; that we shouldn't do that; we are interfering in a private contract. Yet, we are telling the tobacco companies…
Therefore, may I assume that the chairman would support a reprogramming request from any branch of the Department of Defense if that branch found that unavoidable delays in its other programs made funding available for the NATAC?
In 1991, the Congress reformed the FDIC and mandated that the fund keep a reserve to deposit ratio of 1.25%. Fortunately, no government funds were used to keep the FDIC solvent when this was mandated in 1991. It was thought by many that it…
Now read the bottom, line 10. It clearly includes the attorneys for the tobacco companies.





